Roger’s Tax Recovery Letters

March – December 2006

FREELY GIVEN FREELY RECEIVED

With the greatest discovery of the 21st Century, Elvick has once again shared his freely received, freely given knowledge that seems to unfold faster than one can make sense of it. The 88 pages contained herein, are not all the letters he has written on the subject, but I would guess 70% and definitely contain the up-to-date vital information that is revealed from God to him and passed on to us. As he has stated in a card to me, most people’s minds are polarized to such an extent that it is unlikely they will ever understand the simplicity of what has become known as “Tax Recovery”.

This undertaking of compiling these letters was an evolutionary process in itself. Not only, was it, of course, time consuming ordeal to cut, paste and format into 10 points, but I wanted to color-code particular words or passages so one could just scroll down and find that color and the topic they were looking for. With 88 pages of letters and only so many colors to go around, I decided to foreclose that idea. The words and passages highlighted thus far are my own ongoing work to make it easy to find and since this will be given in ‘word’, then you can organize as you please.

These letters contain the methods to describe how one acquires a house or car and explains how to take care of any charge, civil complaint, criminal indictment / complaint and literally how to order or walk into any store, get what you need and assess the amount as your income rather than give them a obligation, which does nothing, and walk out with the proceeds won or lost at casinos. When we look at the Federal Reserve Note we find that is a promise to pay, but it is not payment, but is a future event, and a future event that has not happened yet amounts to speculation whether or not the promise to pay would actually occur. Thus the use of Federal Reserve Notes themselves are gambling proceeds and thereby a Suspicious Activity reportable on 1099-OID and other means of reporting. Thus whoever is getting a paycheck in US dollars is receiving an ISSUE that is reportable on 1099-OID, because; the Federal Reserve Note otherwise referred to as US dollars are evidence of speculation on a future event, (promise to pay), that is gambling on the future event, as one does not know if that promise to pay will return to the source or not. It seems that it will not return to the “Source” unless it is reported on Federal Tax Form 1099 to enable the ISSUE to enter the Electronic Circuit in a journey to the “SOURCE”. Without entry therein it is doubtful that the promise to pay can occur. (The Tax Return).

  • So it seems that wherever a check is issued, is the “ISSUE” reportable on 1099-OID; or, where a cash item in a Federal Reserve Note is given and/or received, or a security given in commercial paper that is payable in Federal Reserve Notes or US dollars, is the gambling proceeds reportable on 1099-OID.
  • The 1099 OID filing instructions refer to the “ISSUE” as the reportable item, and that is the check at the source that has not yet returned to the source. It can’t return to the source until it enters the closed circuit via the Federal Tax Form 1099 in its journey back to the “source”. One could say that the first issue, the check, being the “Source”, is the venue, and after filing 1099 on that issue, the item returning to the “source” I suppose the difference in the Source of issue and the item returning to source, (a tax), is the returning item, is charged electronically and travels in a CLOSED circuit back to the source for settlement in exchange!
  • When you receive a product you have used, and there was no check, therewith, for you to pay the liability assessed in a 1040 tax return, and tax the same as income tax on a 1099-OID filed, therewith. It is the IRS, then, who will tell the product your personal account]. The 1040 is the assessment of that taxable income Court of Record by putting copies of the 1040/1099 into the Court of Record with a remedy. The Administrative Court of Record bound with Revenue in the New Venue.
  • The set-off or report the item/issue as taxable income and request your tax refund from IRS in tax recovery.
  • When we focus our attention on the Withholding, we see it as, in fact, Federal Withholding, by virtue of HJR-192 and subsequent legislation thereon; and we can report it as such when we get a product of our own account that is holding (withholding)-our account and billing us for the product of their Account, as the corporation is or must be in compliance with both State and Federal Registration laws. These laws may or may not require the corporation to do backup withholding; but the officers thereof are then listed as Recipients on the 1099 OID if the corporation tries to deny withholding. And, if the withholding is current, then it probably is not Backup Withholding but is current and not defines as “backup withholding”.
  • If the corporation or agency tries to say they are not required to withhold, then their officers are then held to be in possession of Withholding. But it is still the Dishonor that joins issue for the 1099 OID to tax the amount admittedly withheld. The Backup Withholding requirement is for corporate entities only and does not apply to the individual. If the corporation withholds (which is not mandatory (it is then volunteered)) their check, when sending a contract for tax recovery, a small claim. It is probably the policy of the corporation to use the claim [that] they are not required to Backup Withholding, to actually enter the contract voluntarily, because to actually Withhold and to say they are not required is not the same as doing it.
  • The Corporate Registration saying they are not subject to Backup Withholding probably just means it is not mandatory for them to withhold, but when we volunteer to report the tax, they then are obligated to give us the amount due or withheld (voluntarily)—not being mandatory but volunteered. Thus, the taxable income was voluntarily withheld just like you volunteered to report it (1099 OID). The Dishonor is the Withholding and is taxed to return to the source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct No. (your SSN).
  • When I read the JK material I see they continue to chase tax deferrals from one place to another, and they never make the distinction between dollars of National Currency (tax delinquent taxable income) and the new venue called Revenue, a small claim in tax recovery (after tax revenue). They are chasing the Ghost (Attorney, who is the payer on the commercial issue, they contract when they dishonor you by demanding payment without giving the check/means to pay the set-off. But remember, a set-off is not a settlement in closing, but only a temporary deferral of tax. So, that may be a misleading event, because the tax deferral as set-off might come again to arrest him. The real settlement is what I am dealing with and that is a matter of State evidence, which is direct rather than the federal indirect method.
  • The guy using the FTB Account! There isn’t any! The tax is withheld (The Account) and the product you are billed for). The Withholding is your income tax as the taxable income reportable on 1099 OID and assessed on the 1040.
  • These must be handled on the state level because the county attorney is the one who authorizes issue of municipal bonds to fund banks, both State and Federal. He does this by the county using Blocked Grants of your security numbers themselves to bring the re-payment of loans back to the treasury. This is why Congress does not require Freddie and Fannie to have financial statements — because that would admit they use our property for collateral. It is our personal social security numbers that are now hooked up to the Treasury Direct that can carry the
  • The Puerto Rico affair is a wild goose chase, as the paper they are chasing must be federal to cross international borders, or, internal affairs of the Secret Service, and that involves the IMF and Local Mutual Funds I described above. They use “agents Provocateur” to assume probable cause to charge the issue of financial instruments for use as One-World-Order. The One World Order is a Money Order etc. These money orders all have their origin in the County Attorney’s purchase of Mutual Funds by his assuming a Blocked Grant (Municipal Bonds) of foreign Account that comes and goes where nobody knows). That’s what is reported on 1099 OID when accepting the account that used your product you are billed for. The 1040 requests a tax refund of the money HJR-192 took away, so we could not pay our bills at law, and that left the government obligated to pay for us when we confess the security payments. These are my personal income and I still get a tax refund. Those funds are taxable income to me and I don’t apply for any deductions.
  • She can take those checks and report the income and spend those checks as after-tax income. Also, the house mortgage gets reported as income (taxable income)
  • They must stop protesting the tax and admit the tax on taxable income. That qualifies them for the tax refund, a tax recovery small claim in a new venue called re-Venue.
  • The Ghettos Adolph Hitler used as Municipal Reserves to finance his SS troops, a military buildup of International troops. Notice these are not National Reserves – but Municipal Reserves. And it is the Municipal bonds that fund the County Attorney’s purchase of Mutual Funds that create the International Monetary Fund. This is yours and my mortgage. The amount of the mortgage needs to be reported on the 1099 OID and 1040. E**l does not want the “so called adjustments” s that appears on the 1040 as “adjustable gross income”. When reporting taxable income only, and not taking deductions, there is no adjustment. The taxable income carries over to page 2 of the 1040 without the insurance adjustment when you don’t claim deductions. (Those deductions are the tax deferrals of debts and they can still come back to haunt you). (That’s because the insurance companies carrying the Risk are not using after-tax income but are using your “Account, for themselves, and have spent the reserves they were supposed to be withholding for payment of mortgage company and ask them for instructions from them to her (of their business plan) for how she is to handle the pre-paid mortgage and return the taxable income to the source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct (her SS#). She might mention the taxable income is her personal income (the value of the mortgage).
  • I would think that kind of a letter from her, the mortgage company might Security reported on the 1099 OID and assessed on the 1040 to stop account from the current venue into the revenue
  • Otherwise she might write to the IRS and ask for them to prepare her tax returns that show her taxable income as her personal income, that it be returned to the source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasure Direct (SS#) The reason to ask the question that way, is because, the voluntary tax they have withheld from her is pre-paid; because, it was, and is, from her Account) and she could also instruct them not to take deductions against taxable income if they prepare her returns for her. (There will be 2 returns). One will be 1099 OID and the other 1040.
  • Her drawing off Social Security isn’t a problem, but withdrawing from the system is a big problem and might result in being confined in an institution, as she fears.
  • When I actually started to bring my delinquent tax returns current, it really didn’t take very long and was not as complicated as I thought it was going to be. Now I just need to wait on the results. I didn’t cover all the past items, but, I can do those next year or else go to a 1040 X and amend the one’s I just did.
  • This has gotten very interesting and simpler since I have realized that the Withholding is the taxable income (the Ghost Account) that is reportable for the return to the source. And the said Withholding is Federal Withholding because
  • With these, you don’t need to use the letters to prove dishonor. The account, or who is the one in the Firm who can sign the check for the escrow. It might be enough for one to ask if the signature(s) on the offering is sufficient to bind the escrow dealership to the closing of escrow.
  • In many companies the acceptance of the Firm contract/invoice and, if so, he/she must have their supervisor number that could, probably, serve as the (TIN). You might ask them if that number is to serve as the Tax Payer Identification Number (TIN) to qualify and bind the Firm contract, somewhere, ACCEPTING the terms and conditions, above. That is where you put your addendum to escrow instructions…before you sign the Acceptance. Those added escrow instructions should spell out the exact method the escrow agent must give his check to the seller who must be named to appear at the closing to receive the check in full payment. You don’t care about the fees and costs, etc., as those are between the seller and escrow agent. You only agree to the Purchase Price and, you expect to see the escrow agent give his check for that amount to the seller. –CLOSED!!
  • This is why we accept the manufacturers suggested retail price. There is enough money in the spread between wholesale and retail [prices] for the dealership staff to be paid to settle all the costs of delivery. You only sit and watch until you see the check in the hands of the seller. The dealer is responsible for all the liens, fees, and costs! You only need to see that the escrow agent pays the seller (that might require the 1099-OID to be filed prior to the issue of the check to the seller…maybe simultaneously, leaving the 1096 signed, therewith, [for] the escrow agent to mail to IRS)
  • I suspect the escrow agent’s check can’t be issued unless the 1099-OID is in the contract, signed and dated!
  • I expect when one signs an acceptance and there is no check, therewith, to pay the seller, which is the point of dishonor and entry into the International Contract of revenue. That is the point of Withholding the amount said in the contract, and the escrow agent fails to close, then one must fill out an identical 1099OID but check the VOID box [X] and, immediately, following that, fill out the next 1099-OID and check the CORRECTION box [X] at the top of the form, and fill out the form with the same Payer and Recipient but, also, put the amount into the Federal Withholding box. That way they are on record for being in possession of taxable income the IRS can get for you when you file for a tax refund on your 1040.
  • What is so fascinating in getting a dismissal from IRS prosecutions using an attorney who is very likely responsible for the charges coming against one? The Internet download entitled 1040 Checkmate? I do not understand why such fascination with opposing the 1040 Tax Return? Why does everyone always point out that one is not required to file IRS Form 1040 for any reason? The failure to file charges one receives for not filing is because one is spending and consuming products of corrupt revenue that is tax delinquent (contraband). Isn’t one sure way to beat the charge of willful failure to file or failure to produce books and records for filing, to simply file the 1040? But then we know it takes more than filing a 1040 to obtain the remedy. Although the 1040 includes the 1099 OID entry, and one must use the 1099 forms to report account”, or often referred to as “none existing”, suspense account. That is because it is taken by assuming the product of the default of that causes the lender to seek the underlying asset as collateral (you and your SS#).
  • So, the main problem seems to be people failing to understand how delivery of product, we receive Bills for that are Pre-paid by virtue of the interest for its use?) Is that not an act of soliciting? Are not the donators going to bed with a prostitute? Larry Becraft is admittedly a solicitor when he admits being a member of the security says it is suspending your benefit, that doesn’t necessarily mean they have stopped them. It only means they have been accrued into a suspense account until the owner can prove it is his personal income by asking social security to file the 1099 on the Original Issue Discount, or if they refuse, to file it themselves, and follow with the 1040 to self assess those particular funds as personal income. (That 1040 is the Certificate of bank account that were inn operation before the Social Security Number was connected to the Treasury Direct electronically in June of 2003. That might change how we are to deal with the escrow agent. So, let me suggest here that you try using a account. I don’t think there is any limit for the account. Then, the agreement. If there is a dis-agreement/dishonour they then, obviously, have violated their own conscience and committed perjury.
    1. So, the game is for connecting the agreements together voluntarily, and where the dishonor is voluntarily withheld the escrow agent cannot claim the taxable income withheld as his personal income on his 1040 tax return; but he must report that amount as a deductible item allowed by the agency he is employed at as an escrow agent. The agency still must pay for the options that go with a vehicle; and the escrow agent makes sure those items are paid for by the agency and, thereby, can deduct those items on their Individual 1040 tax return in a private contract matter required by the contracting buyer to utilize private funds to settle and close in exchange Treasury Direct (your SS#). Thus, the buyer can use 1040-V to vouch for the funds going through the account for his company pre-paying the vehicle and options purchased, that company has been forced into a forward sale (like Enron) where they must list a tax loss measured against the employees (escrow agents) tax deduction (taken against excess proceeds as Federal account privately for settlement with the buyer using private funds. (The taxable income needs to stay connected as it passes through into the Treasury.)
    2. Anyway, with the tax returns charged with our assessments, I don’t think they can keep our remedy from us for long. Those charges are, now, alive and will keep eating away at whosoever is responsible for withholding our taxable income, and the means by which the benefits those funds represent, should not be able to stand idle while our needs go unfulfilled.
    3. When I don’t feel good it’s hard to focus my thoughts on anything like a remedy we need with the tax refund. But, then, it isn’t too hard to imagine that using the filthy lucre of the public account of issue. Or, you might use the name of the actual Payer who paid your account. Either way, it came from your account, and needs to return to that source.
    4. Federal withholding. They are simply reported as Original Issue, but they don’t appear on the form as Federal Withholding. But, nevertheless, that filing declares those funds to be private and not state casino issues that are taxed out of circulation via the 1099-OID used. The 1040 still needs to take these filings and assess the income tax, thereon, to charge the income as personal income. Otherwise, the income remains taxable income but nobody knows whose income it is—so it continues to circulate as public account it goes into (this is cause for obesity).
    5. The Administrative HOLD spoken of is: the software in a computer with “no charge” to close the circuit. These administrative accounts are operated by people who don’t know what they do. They operate on the protocol called for on their job and when he assumed charge is made, which is “no charge, there is no actual charge to close the electronic circuit in the computer which leaves the account escrow open (an open grave) for the public to assume there is a charge—when there is none. The actual account is hooked up by electronic interfacing to-do electronic funds transfer but, if there are no actual charges that can enter and close the circuit in the computer at the Treasury, then there are no charges, in fact, but there is an imposter standing in the “holy place” declaring himself to be god (the state employee). It takes a social security # to connect to the Treasury Direct and, it takes a 1040 tax return to report the income that can travel in that closed circuit! That tax is the charge that closes the circuit in the administrative computer that assumed the HOLD when their circuits remained open when the “empty charge” was entered into that file. The Warrant # entered is an “unpaid check” warranted by the state that has not been charged with a REAL tax assessment! The only real tax assessment there is is from an Individual 1040 Tax Return.
    6. That should spell out the basis of a warrant and how the warrant, being empty or no-charge, is the basis the public administration used to put a hold on the person’s name who appears on the warrant, because they, otherwise, have no charge, thereon. So, the person whose name appears on the warrant should report that particular as personal income, and report the same on 1040 to assess the tax on that particular warrant. When the tax is actually assessed on 1040, that particular tax charge accelerates time to maturity of the agency/corporation forward sales agreements and contracts, for delivery from tax loss write-off from the agency/corporation time to maturity tax charge in ordinary time.
    7. It is at this point the agency/corporation agent voluntarily withholds the taxable income—the same being Federal Withholding. At this point the funds are revenue in tax recovery. They do not mix or co-mingle with other public currency.
    8. When you file the 1099-OID on funds like I did as Recipient of my Social Security funds, they are not listed as Federal withholding. They are simply reported as Original Issue, but they don’t appear on the form as Federal Withholding. But, nevertheless, that filing declares those funds to be private and not state casino issues that are taxed out of circulation via the 1099-OID used. The 1040 still needs to take these filings and assess the income tax, thereon, to charge the income as personal income. Otherwise, the income remains taxable income but nobody knows whose income it is—so it continues to circulate as public account it goes into (this is cause for obesity). 8
    9. Dear account then and there. The VOID box might be used to void the use of our SS#. I need to see what happens when I do some of these. I don’t think the VOID shows on the payer and recipient copies. The IRS could go after the corporate withholding and not let the agency know we have VOIDED the account assumed by them. When I just looked at the payers copy of 1099, I see it shows the VOID and CORRECTED on that copy. But Recipients copy only has the CORRECTED on it. So, that means the recipient has taxable income in his/her possession that has been VOID but they don’t know that. Only that they must owe what has been reported as withholding! These need to be closely examined! I think we can use 1099 of some sort to VOID bills that have assumed the use of our insurance, etc.
    10. When he goes to the certificate of deposit sufficient to cover his purchase of the car and to run his small business (THE STRAWMAN) until the end of the calendar year. Then ask the Deposit to put into a savings account. Also, seek to have a debit card issued and a corresponding checking account wherein funds can be transferred from savings to checking from time to time to guarantee the pre-payment of checks and Debit Cards and surrender early withdrawal penalties on the CD, and/or portions of it
    11. When sitting with the acceptance might be oral at first) but when you sign anything it will be an acceptance, and with that you will want to add your addendum of escrow closing instructions for the escrow agent to fill out Federal Tax Form 1096/1099-OID on the particular issue of the accepted item. So, somewhere along that line you will get a refusal/dishonour Probably when you agree or sign an acceptance and when you tell them the item is pre-paid. Somewhere about there you can expect to get the denial/dishonour. (It might take 3 denials). But, nevertheless, if denied or when denied, then give the agent your list of escrow instructions for closing, that will include an express request that the escrow agent prepare and file Federal Tax Form 1096 and 1099-OID on this particular issue, for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct #(your SSN). Also, include asking the agent for a supervisor to close the escrow. That might take care of one of the denials. Or, maybe, you will have the 3 denials in the string of incidentals asked for (maybe instruments to operate the account), before you ask the supervisor to prepare and file Federal Forms 1096 & 1099-OID to return the taxable income Withheld from you, to Treasury Direct # (your SSN) for settlement and closing in exchange.
    12. Someone needs to try this to see how the Set-off or discharge refused: Dishonour = Withholding tax recovery—a small claim
    13. 7-27-06 Dear charge the same to the Escrow Agent whose name was reported on 1099 OID. That way the escrow agent gets charged privately to close the escrow. Notice too, that the money order puts the money in the box {black box}. This is the same information box that the airlines carry to record classified information. I am pretty sure that the PO Box in the municipality where our social security numbers have been taken from the rolls, is the black box on the money order and 9

    the same is also the Federal Withholding Box on the 1099 OID and other 1099 forms too, on the Recipient Copy B that is!! They also ship prisoners in Black Boxes snapped over their handcuffs. So this is an admission the prisoner is carrying the charges listed therein. Then, when the escrow agent gets his check to charge the escrow for settlement, he has no choice but to pay for your/our benefit, or else he is in position to have a perjured Individual tax return. The penalties of perjury are self-inflicted disease. These are contracted for, by a compromise of one’s conscience. (The Shadow knows!! Ha! Ha! Ha!) Sal sent me this yellow pad I am writing on and a supply of envelopes.

    1. When the money orders go to IRS they go with a 1040-V. But I see no reason to send a copy to the escrow agent. They should get a check from the United States Treasury for the amount reported in the Recipients box on the 1099 and that same said amount put into the money order to IRS with 1040-V therewith.
    2. I am not sure about our getting tax refunds directly from the IRS. I think it will take our money order to the IRS to pay out to the escrow agent who is responsible to invest the money into financial instruments such as Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills or product of the money from the black box. It is an escrow agent who is charged therefrom to close the case/escrow for our benefit. Where it says: Pay—{this amount in black box} etc., etc.
    3. Dear product or substance of some kind. If the money order tells the IRS to pay $ to the United States Treasury and charge the same to the escrow agent, it is the person of the agent who is named who has the obligation to put the funds into rolling stock or substance. Thus, the Treasury would have their escrow agent put the funds into rolling stock or substance. Thus the Treasury would have their escrow agent put the refunds into their catalog items of T-bonds, T-Notes, & T-bills with interest rates and maturity dates with the items in your name – also provide you with a statement of account showing the current value and status of those items. Their escrow agent is probably your local account with the Treasury itself. That would probably be processed through the Federal Reserve charge the same to the escrow agents, to enable us to get settlement in the actual substance offered by the one who sends the charge the same to the particular person giving you the product and the funds both!
    4. If you should elect to try this, you can issue the money order and 1040-V to the IRS without giving the escrow agent any notice whatsoever. But once the agent gets a check from the Treasury for this purpose, he must pay them out for your benefit because he must account for those funds on his Individual 1040 tax return. Thus he must spend those funds for your benefit and, he can’t win by not spending like said, because; the IRS will know he has taxable income in his possession by virtue of not cashing the check. So once you think this through you will see that by paying them binds them to spend for your benefit.
    5. I think the tax refund cannot be paid out to us directly. That’s why we need to pay the money order to 3rd party escrow agents (those who send you the product received, but the product as personal income, where there is no Federal withholding. It is the Federal withholding Box that has the Black border drawn around it on the Recipient Copy B. Or, since you admit to being the recipient by having received the product, but the product or not, seems to be irrelevant, as the withholding is reference to funds regardless of product or not. So, in that sense, I am inclined to think the money order to IRS with the 1040-V might be all that is needed for consumer items. Big ticket items might be more of a problem. 10
    6. Maybe some of your circle will have something to add to this: Ethel, BB, RR, or Kevin, etc. But anyway, here is the written reminder that points in the direction for our remedy. I was previously of a mind that if I had received product and put myself as recipient there was not Federal withholding. But if the product is pre-paid, then the withholding is a Federal taxable item notwithstanding the product
    . So it seems the 1040-V with the money order to IRS is the remedy. We have some of those in use now that we should soon know the results.

  • Something should be said about PO Box in our mailing address. These are not Post Office Boxes. These are commercial Purchase Order Boxes of Residents in the municipality where one resides and the zip code with the Box number appearing in a 4 digit extension gives their Federal ID number of the commercial transaction who the resident is that lives there.
  • I am enclosing a rough draft of a money order to IRS that goes with a 1040-V. That should give you another option for your remedy.
  • The main idea I want to get across to you is: the difference between a charge and the other is charged. Of course, the charge and is looking to be charged. The tax, of course, is charged and is capable of closing escrow on an charge is assumed as probable cause but is still not charged as a matter of fact. And this reversed idea of a charge, the same being a lie, is what the state employees use to disguise themselves with a charge that person’s charge the same to the 3rd party escrow agent is based upon the 1040 assessment that is a self assessment that charges the money order to pay as said. So, it is the 1040 that is the charging event.
  • Now, remember, the charge the charge a warrant, so a true security numbers from the municipal rolls of the residents thereof and use that charge the victim for the unauthorized use of the charge is connected in fact. So, the true charge the escrow agent who accused us or sent the charge is binding on that agent. The charge in fact closes the circuit/escrow.
  • So the tax is charged with magnetic energy to draw the
  • 8-15-06 Dear A.
  • Your questions for what I did with the Debbie Heim offers is just what you see. She made me 3 separate offers with 3 separate small ID numbers. These were in response to my giving Wells Fargo branch manager Deeton, at M.H, a 1099-OID for a Federal Reserve certificate of a Treasury deposit slip and refused to return the T-item to me. D. H. wrote to me about that matter 3 times (3 offers) but did not provide payment. Thus, she withheld the taxable income 3 times. So, that resulted in my reporting that/those offers on 1099-OID and issuing the money order and 1040-V to IRS to pay those amounts offered to the Treasury, and pay the same (charge the same) to D. H. to enable her to fund the CD I originally gave Wells Fargo; but, now, it is 3 million plus the 1 million still to be processed with Mr. D. (You might notice the 1040-V carries the same OMB# 1545-0074, the same as a regular 1040 form). I expect we are able to use the 1040-V to report each item as personal income as it arrives throughout the year. With these Money Orders like that, the escrow agent who is charged will pay us what is owed rather than IRS giving a refund. At least, that’s the way it looks, now.
    1. There was nothing different with what I did with K. K., as I think you are bankruptcy as they had sold that amount into the Japanese Stock Market for $1,389,000,000. So you see, the basis they used was simply to add 000 to my account held by K. K. (You know the rest of the story). The other entry of $1,000,000 was a security items given to a South Dakota business organization to hold, with K. K., and the State of Minnesota, the sponsor for those funds.
    2. The Carol Zurn $20,200 is a 2nd bank account and she wrote and told me she wanted $200 for that information. So, being a 2nd charge her for the settlement. The acceptance and return [of the acceptance of the charge the tax.
    3. Winston gave me a sample copy of doing this with 1040-ES. But I elected to use 1040-V because 1040-ES is a Fiscal Year report. My 1040-V is a Calendar Year return.
    4. The fellow at the car dealership: I would say to not try it the way you size it up. I am not sure the dealership has a commercially charged bank account that were inn operation before the Social Security Number was connected to the Treasury Direct electronically in June of 2003. That might change how we are to deal with the escrow agent. So, let me suggest here that you try using a account. I don’t think there is any limit for the account. Then, the agreement. If there is a dis-agreement/dishonour they then, obviously, have violated their own conscience and committed perjury.
    5. So, the game is for connecting the agreements together voluntarily, and where the dishonour is voluntarily withheld the escrow agent cannot claim the taxable income withheld as his personal income on his 1040 tax return; but he must report that amount as a deductible item allowed by the agency he is employed at as an escrow agent. The agency still must pay for the options that go with a vehicle; and the escrow agent makes sure those items are paid for by the agency and, thereby, can deduct those items on their Individual 1040 tax return in a private contract matter required by the contracting buyer to utilize private funds to settle and close in exchange Treasury Direct (your SS#). Thus, the buyer can use 1040-V to vouch for the funds going through the estate! And, as Winston says, to pay the account for his company pre-paying the vehicle and options purchased, that company has been forced into a forward sale (like Enron) where they must list a tax loss measured against the employees (escrow agents) tax deduction (taken against excess proceeds as Federal account privately for settlement with the buyer using private funds. (The taxable income needs to stay connected as it passes through into the Treasury.)
    1. 8-23-06: Dear A,
    2. Everyone is getting over-anxious about the IRS getting difficult in getting any tax refund paid to us. Do you suppose this is another grand scheme to bait-and-switch?
    3. Anyway, with the tax returns charged with our assessments, I don’t think they can keep our remedy from us for long. Those charges are, now, alive and will keep eating away at whosoever is responsible for withholding our taxable income, and the means by which the benefits those funds represent, should not be able to stand idle while our needs go unfulfilled.
    4. I will be waiting to hear what you find out from IRS before trying to make any sense out of the delayed refunds.

    Then, too, I should like to hear from Gary P. and/or Joan for the outcome of his trial, as he will probably have some good information for how effective his use of the 1099-OID’s and 1040 are in his use, thereof, to defend himself. I hope he was able to share my letter with you as that had some information I was unable to duplicate before mailing to him.

    1. When I don’t feel good it’s hard to focus my thoughts on anything like a remedy we need with the tax refund. But, then, it isn’t too hard to imagine that using the filthy lucre of the public charge is binding on the conscience, whose agreement is bound by the 1040 assessment. If they wish to continue the delays they will compound the accountability. So, maybe, just a lot of patience will cause the charges to fester with those they have left in harms way.
    2. I don’t think we want to start jumping through the hoops that IRS is suggesting that we tell them how we want to be paid. They owe us the tax refund; now, they can write us the check and we will figure out where and how to deposit it…. after we get it. Maybe make them give us two checks; one small enough to be able to use for our personal needs and the other we can use to find a place to deposit and invest the proceeds. (Probably in the Treasury, itself).
    3. I don’t like the sound of what JR and the others here are thinking of doing to comply with unreasonable IRS conditions for them to make payment. That game is another Withholding that the original tax derived from. So, we might be at our best to wait and see what the charge really does. The 1040 is still the Certificate of nature of the tax charges are, after they have been assessed and charged as a tax on the 1040. Then, too, we need to be looking for what occurs with these matters as the questions might be answered soon and simply.
    4. Maybe a letter needs to be composed to accuse the IRS for erecting barriers to our remedy by omission, in that they fail to produce a means for us to make use of the tax refund that is, otherwise, referred to as tax recovery. If we are unable to use a tax refund that they admit is owed to us, then, if they are unable to make it available for our use, they then, in fact, have withheld the taxable income themselves…and there is no refund as a matter of fact. It won’t be long, if our refunds are not paid, that the IRS is going to have a lot of explaining to do on the tax refund admissions they made on the Internet.
    5. It was good to hear that Gary was able to prevail, so far, in his trial. I was wondering if his requesting his accusers to file 1099-OID’s would be enough to keep him free from lockup. So, it seems that [procedure] has worked so far, and now he has enough time to tie up the loose ends.
    6. BB sent me a form letter that requests the IRS to file the appropriate Federal Tax Forms to properly report my personal income. We should all be able to use that form for us, here. I think I might use that form but minus the prior filing references and see if IRS would file for those who have not done so, yet. There are quite a number of illiterates here in prison that this proposal for IRS to do their tax returns for them might work. We will have to see how the IRS receives those kinds of requests.
    7. The arrest of the algebra fellows. What was that all about? They probably were able to express some of the income tax terms in code or assumptions that really was a sophisticated tax protest. Where were the 1040 returns for these fellows? If they didn’t have any filed they were prime bait for arrest.
    8. I need to write to BB, again, as there are unexpected questions that came up on the Judges mortgage is a municipal cemetery. The material you sent, however, does give some information that includes municipal cemeteries. Then, too, I see the material that pertains to the State of Ohio has a complaint form that might work in my case, where I wrote to the county attorney for this county and he failed to answer. The complaint form, itself, seems to be specifically designed for comment on refusal of attorneys to answer inquiries.
    9. I am not exactly sure if these descriptions of National Cemetery requirements will show how the municipals must comply with the national scheme or, if it is the other way around. Are National Reserves the internal Municipal Reserves? The national scheme of things are collective, whereas, the Municipal is particular and specific, where Resident is identified in particular holding a reservation on a cemetery lot. I don’t know of any citizen who is specifically identified in that role. The citizens seem to be a part of a collective bargaining operation of a pool of mortgages (Freddie Mac), otherwise known as the Dow Jones Averages—thus mob rule. Other descriptions of this are known as a
    10. So, when one examines these conditions, we can easily see why the accusers have gone to the extreme lengths of deception that they have to hide the mortgage taken on their oath, and used a cemetery plot as the collateral for the Real Estate Mortgage, and the resident holding the reservation, thereon, accountable for the local tax, thereon, the same being the mortgage payments assessed by the city or county auditor.
    11. I think these estate they acquire, to set their store on, and that abandoned real estate is taxed by the city and county, and those payments are simply mortgage payments that should be going to anyone who can move into that abandoned property and lay claim to those tax returns, etc. The City and County assume they own PRIVATE PROPERTY (because it is taxable income that cannot be agency/corporation property!) Then whose property is it? Is it blocked in a Black Box?
    12. So, when one gets the actual description of the Metes and Bounds of a Wal-Mart store, and proceeds to put his name on it as the owner, then all the Wal-Mart payments made to the city and county now go to the owner as Estate. Currently, Wal-Mart is paying property is private and not public. Thus, the revenue is internal and a claim on the property and a tax assessment on the same, accelerates the time to maturity of the Wal-Mart contract to the owner, forthwith!
    13. This condition with Wal-Mart stores, just mentioned above, is one of the results we came across in our search for the financing method used by the Chief Judge on his Oath promise to pay.
    14. The cemetery regulations indicate a business can obtain certain Lots that can be plotted for grave sites, and held for future use. It looks like the lots can be various sizes (probably depending on the population of the Municipality,, etc.) but indications so far show at least 3 sizeable lots can be held by a business like Wal-Mart Stores, where I live, has three different Real Estate Lots it sits on. These were prior farm sites.
    15. This situation described above is just one of many possibilities for the location of the Cemetery Plotted Lots the judge’s oath is based upon. But, that type property might be a clue to how other Public organizations obtain use of private property—by keeping private persons from being able to make claim on it. We might discover the master plot in our search for the Chief Judges’ Oath attorney who refused to answer my request for information for my name appearing on the Residential Roll of Nelsonville . And I, subsequently, wrote to the State Superintendent for Real Estate and Professional Licensing who, also, oversees the cemeteries in this respect. I complained to this lady because the county attorney refused that inquiry. It will be interesting how she will act knowing the county attorney is getting an IRS tax form to certify his TIN#.
    16. I haven’t let them know, yet, that I am seeking the $30,000 delivery contracts’ time to maturity and, they are compelled to take a tax loss write-off in spite of their assumed exemption they can’t realize as a matter-of-14

    fact. The 1040 is "holy ground" and they can’t stand on that with commercial trappings. Thus, they are held to the penalties of perjury (ex officio).

    1. In all these cases where probable cause is assumed, these actors, also, assume there is no contract is accelerated in time to maturity for tax loss write-off and, thereby, surrenders the delivery of collateral held in the forward sale contract(s).
    2. They haven’t had to deliver the collateral, yet, because we must not have, yet, located the contract and/or real estate with the mortgage on it
    3. Everyone needs to start writing inquiries to the local Coroners and County Attorneys or mortuaries and/or Superintendents of Professional Licensing and Regulating of Cemeteries asking for the geographical "Metes and Bounds" location, and where your name appears on a Residential Roll having a Reservation on a Plotted Lot as required by law. Where is that particular lot located? And what are the financial liabilities connected, thereto? Those questions can be put to them as you have a need to know because-of town, state and federal tax reporting requirements! 1. Ask for the official Roll on which your name and SS# appear in the Residence having the corresponding cemetery lot reserved. 2. Ask for the geographical location of the Residence and the corresponding cemetery plot (metes and bounds) reserved for that resident. 3. Ask for the tax assessment on the residence and on the corresponding cemetery lot (the metes and bounds, included) and/or the "metes and bounds" thereof, if the same said property is held to be exempt; and the corresponding statute or other law or regulation declaring the exemption. 4. Ask for the holders’ name if exemption is claimed; and, the name of the person or organization who pays for the upkeep of the property or, otherwise, contributes to the maintenance of the property via Estate purchase made by a prisoner, who has sent a Request to the Attorney General of Ohio/ex officio for his accommodation signature on a Real Estate Attorney General ex officio will try to withhold that taxable income!!
      1. Dear Federal court. There has been some controversy on the internet that BB encountered when they wee trying to bring the indictment into comments from me when I was in Cayahoga County custody. They were trying to bring comments relating to the North Dakota Supreme argument(s) that were all empty charges (he simply didn’t have any money to pay me). He, and his realtor buddy, Walsted, were trying every way to avoid the real obligation the Realtor Walsted had—to close the escrow by giving me his check in closing the escrow. Everything about the case arguments were simply a collection of irrelevant comments made to obscure the real cause of Byes failure to prevail: Byes realtor buddy, Walsted, simply failed to pay me—pure and simple. Any comments made on the internet websites were malicious slander and libel by those who attempted to cast me in a bad and questionable light. But now that the property disguised in delinquent events.
      2. My letter to the FSA County Committee is official notice that if they participate in putting government payments and security for loans and marketing of products of the delinquent tax matters confronted in my letter, into the hands of unauthorized persons, the same is traffic in illegal drugs. The County Committee will have something to say to the State Director if he chooses to withhold the information from me. Also, there is a good chance the County Committee will not let any more government money go to those who are standing in line to get those funds. This is going to get interesting!

      BB will, probably, find this especially interesting since the internet propaganda surfaced—with no names of who was responsible for that. (I wonder if they have reported their income

    4. Dear account of issue. Or, you might use the name of the actual Payer who paid your account. Either way, it came from your account, and needs to return to that source.
    5. I know I listed myself as Recipient on the funds I actually got from Social Security because they were not withheld from me, but I still wanted those funds reported as my personal income so that the property that income was would identify the same to belong to me. If I had it to do over, again, I think I would report my bank account. I would say it would have to be the artificial and might not work. Then, the recipient is obvious for who that should be. Remember, we are doing this privately and the public regulations do not apply.
    6. When you file the 1099-OID on funds like I did as Recipient of my Social Security funds, they are not listed as Federal withholding. They are simply reported as Original Issue, but they don’t appear on the form as Federal Withholding. But, nevertheless, that filing declares those funds to be private and not state casino issues that are taxed out of circulation via the 1099-OID used. The 1040 still needs to take these filings and assess the income tax, thereon, to charge the income as personal income. Otherwise, the income remains taxable income but nobody knows whose income it is—so it continues to circulate as public account it goes into (this is cause for obesity).
    7. The Administrative HOLD spoken of is: the software in a computer with “no charge” to close the circuit. These administrative accounts are operated by people who don’t know what they do. They operate on the protocol called for on their job and when the assumed charge is made, which is “no charge, there is no actual charge to close the electronic circuit in the computer which leaves the account escrow open (an open grave) for the public to assume there is a charge—when there is none. The actual account is hooked up by electronic interfacing to-do electronic funds transfer but, if there are no actual charges that can enter and close the circuit in the computer at the Treasury, then there are no charges, in fact, but there is an imposter standing in the “holy place” declaring himself to be god (the state employee). It takes a social security # to connect to the Treasury Direct and, it takes a 1040 tax return to report the income that can travel in that closed circuit! That tax is the charge that closes the circuit in the administrative computer that assumed the HOLD when their circuits remained open, when the “empty charge” was entered into that file. The Warrant # entered is an “unpaid check” warranted by the state that has not been charged with a REAL tax assessment! The only real tax assessment there is, is from an Individual 1040 Tax Return.
    8. That should spell out the basis of warrant and how the warrant, being an empty or no-charge, is the basis the public administration used to put a hold on the person’s name who appears on the warrant, because they, otherwise, have no charge, thereon. So, the person whose name appears on the warrant should report that particular as personal income, and report the same on 1040 to assess the tax on that particular warrant. When the tax is actually assessed on 1040, that particular tax charge accelerates time to maturity of the agency/corporation forward sales agreements and contracts, for delivery from tax loss write-off from the agency/corporation time to maturity tax charge in ordinary time.
    9. It is at this point the agency/corporation agent voluntarily withholds the taxable income—the same being Federal Withholding. At this point the funds are revenue in tax recovery. They do not mix or co-mingle with other public currency.
    10. Your letter questioning getting higher-ups in IRS involved I don’t really want to do for myself, just now. If the conventional stuff doesn’t get results as fast as everyone likes, then I don’t want to press matters from that position. The charges made for tax assessments made are sufficient to cause those who actually have them in account to wish they had swift relief when these charges start to fester.
    11. Dear default on that.
    12. In regard to BB’s reference to “counter securities” we need to take another look at how to deal with it. The counter security she is referring to, being an agency claim (contract/agreement that accelerates into time to maturity tax loss write-off when assessed and taxed on 1040. After this tax loss write-off occurs, that’s when the agency employee volunteers to withhold the taxable income (rather taxed income at this point) and it is Federal Withholding reportable on 1099-OID. The tax assessment mentioned above could be assessed on the 1040X or, more likely, issue a 1040-V as a Payment Voucher by writing on the obligation to make settlement with us, as when HJR-192 took our money …gold… out of circulation and, now, we have paid it back via the account is inversely paid dollar for dollar the -0- accrues as a result. So, where is the Security they must surrender in 3 days? Is this the “counter security” BB is referring to, or is she talking about the voluntary withholding being the “counter security” which is a Federal Withholding, or,, is the failure to surrender the security a new security”? Maybe a letter to the sender is in order to make them spell out what is held, or withheld after tax loss write-off of agency, and where is the basis of a new security” by co-mingling tax revenue with state regulated casino funds reportable on Federal Tax Form 1099-OID. Which does their accounting done by Enron. The VA (Vets Admin) and others need to be accused of this type accounting; and made to explain how the “counter security” can exist when the tax assessed on the particular issue accelerates the agency time to maturity (ordinary time) into tax loss write-off and the securities held, thereby, delivered in 3 days (72 hours). How do they gain possession of tax recovery revenue to enable the sender to make a new claim, or to assume he has a claim on the prior assessed account. (Ask if the prior assessed account had a double indemnity that is present in the
    13. But, no matter, the agencies who are playing the accounting game need to be written to and accused of the Enron type accounting deception(s) and confronted with the questions, like stated above. Someone should lay out all those questions in a letter to the agency agent in the appropriate order I mention them and, maybe, in a form letter that can be developed to put the renegade agencies and their agents into exposure of what they are doing.
    14. I am beginning to suspect that those agents/employees of agency are, in fact, IRS agents; all of them, because the real Republican form of government is in that private structure—the government having gone private in the 1040 tax assessment. At that point, the one who withholds taxable income is, in fact, an IRS agent, and when we take the charge of the agency sending you the liability that then become a tax refund, if requested by the 1040 Filer. The IRS agents can only be identified as such when they are in possession of revenue passing through their hands. So, those agency employees become special IRS agents when they voluntarily withhold taxable income, which is known as Federal Withholding.
    15. If I had been asked to suggest how Sally should file, without having to document all my reasons, I would say that the best way is to accelerate all her past years into the 2005 year filing, like I did. There a lot of items that were not included in those 30 years covered in that 2005 year 1040 of mine, but, the best information was used that I had available at the time, and if IRS should give me additional bills that need to be reported, I can, probably, settle the immediate collateral (forward sales) to you in 3 days (72 hours). If they fail with this, accuse them of the Enron accounting methods of abuse.
    16. For now, I think any further comments from me would tend to distract. So, see how this fits with what you are already doing.
    17. Dear express status to BB and GP, because she pointed out where the business address
    18. His city,/town and state and zip 17

      1. Now you make her employer responsible for the delivery. It’s not going to be given to us, so we must take it! And by using that to deposit the tax refund into the jurisdiction Republican. Thus, the revenue is again public (Re)public (like (Re)fund).
      2. So, JR is considering bringing an admiralty with the idea the tax assessment sets the vessel under the gold fringe flag that will sail Republican, whereas it was sailing under a black flag before (as a pirate!). So, the delivery agreements to deliver prisoners, bonds, bid bonds, performance bonds, payment bonds, Miller Act bonds, US bonds, etc. The 1040 being as Exhibit in evidence (the court of Record) as the article III delivery contracts and collateral thereof not having been released in the 3 day (72 hours) time, is the evidence they have the booty in their possession. It will be the United States of American ex rel, vs. The Warden et al and the Governor and State of Ohio. It is the State of Ohio vessels that are sailing as a pirate. JR is still contemplating this.
      3. If we can get an business office we now need to have the specific number on the withdrawal slip of copies we want. That might not sound like much of a restriction, but sometimes it takes a week or 10 days to get a withdrawal slip approved to then find an officer who will do it. (Actually make the copies for us). So, if you start to think about this, you begin to see that decision is a deliberate attempt to slow the legal and commercial process coming against the pimps and prostitutes who run the show. But that’s the way the negative mind works, so we need to adjust to that, and, no doubt in doing that, we will develop methods of dealing with their repulsive methods much more efficiently.
      4. So, I think in the end we will be even better off getting more proficient against their oppressive methods because we have less paper to deal with we deprive them of using them against us if they don’t exist in the first place.
      5. When you look at my last letter to BB and GP you can see what I mean by the recommended use of the 1040-V. That recommended use is a tax assessment that ends agency/corporation use of commercial contracts, bonds and securities etc., in their forward sales thereof. That 1040-V issue is the Mill Levy. The Bible says the millstone is cast into the sea never to be heard again. So, by oral order there can be no tax assessment made. It must come by original endorsement by someone who can author the assessment under the penalty of perjury-thus the 1040 Record of Tax Return. The 1040-V is the method of direct pay to the Treasury. That is the payment voucher and the assessment of the money order/contract taxed into maturity by the tax loss write-off that must be taken on the agency contractcontract (new Testament) or the tax (re) fund.
      1. So, I don’t think we need Xerox copies to keep track of how we use 1040-V to pay our bills with. When we get a account, because that might need to be redone by using a agency head one can find in public records, like maybe the Secretary of State who is “in charge” of business registration! That person will be who will be responsible on their personal 1040.
      2. I have been taking bills and writing Pay to the US Treasury on the liability on the 1040-V.
      3. First of all, the 1040-V you gave him/them assessed the tax on the indemnity…so, you will send him 1040-V to cover the additional amount, plus a $300 Penalty for Private use.
      4. The 1040-V (payment voucher) carries with it the money order (delivery (surrender of collateral in 3 days (72 hours). Failure to surrender puts the Withholding into the hands of the agent ex officio, who is voluntarily holding Federal withholding…which is your taxed income. It is no longer taxable income and, it is contraband if it is still in possession of the collector. The item is taxed via the 1040-V (the same is assessed by the 1040-V given, and accounting on a regular 1040 for tax refund, but that could be summed up at the end of the calendar year and entered on the Regular 1040 for that purpose. But, then, IRS will have that info and one could, probably, use a letter to request they property when he can’t rely on “probable cause assumed in a criminal forum?” Remember, the mill stone is cast into the sea never to be heard, again, so if his 1040 cannot assess a tax, and you put his agency (assumption) out of business with a 1040-V assessment, in fact, then where is his basis to tax or assess you to pay a account, yet, then write $300 on
      5. No matter with what Ethel is doing, she needs to put the 1040-V assessment on the mortgage to accelerate their contracts all into tax loss write-off, and ask for the property. She might need to put the $300 Penalty for Private Use into assessment on the person who is pressing the mortgage foreclosure, to make sure the Penal estate mortgage) I am pursuing that
      6. The reason the collector will want to stop the conversation is because he knows he is making a claim that is assumed as a tax assessment against you; but, as soon as he realizes that you are actually assessing the tax, in fact, via 1040-V, he knows the actual tax gets assessed by you putting it into an invoice (writing) 1040-V, and, it is an actual tax, now.…whereas, before, he knew his assumed accusation actually makes no tax assessment; and the real assessment on 1040-V does tax the issue into the Treasury to render it -0-. Thus, he is exposed for the Acceptance, first, as if that was the accelerator, so let me start over, again.
      7. It is the tax assessment on the 1040 that accelerates agency/corporation forward sales contracts/agreements (bonds, notes, loans, securities, etc.) into time maturity tax loss write-off in ordinary time (the tax loss write-off is negative payment in return to the source—i.e., Treasury) You are taxing the charge of tax recovery. The 1040 Court of Record is an Article III jurisdiction in Admiralty to enforce the Judgment and Orders of the Republic established with the tax on the liability)…and the trip to the Republic has begun. Three (3) days (72 hours) for the temple (body) to be raised up, again… returned in tax recovery).
      8. 9-27-06 Dear contract you are going to bind to the transaction. To set out to do this, you ask the dealership salesperson to make you an insurance to drive off the lot. That means the registration fees to be sure the vehicle is in your name before you drive away with it. If they want you to fill out the contract, they will want something from you to guarantee the acceptance contract, write on it somewhere: “Pay to the United States Treasury”.
      9. Dear accounting, and the matter is conscience—and there is no record except in the conscience. Those agencies that choose to cooperate could hypothecate a statement for their supervisor to show what happens but, where you are dealing directly with pirates and their plundered spoils, you are going to have to treat them, like [said] above, as the most economical way for us. It’s usually easier for us to give them a 1040-V tax assessment, return [contract for Aids. The death certificate will then connect you your 1040-V social security number at that point through the 1545-0074 OMB number.
        1. If those other options with the money order, therewith, work, then I see nothing wrong here to use them. But, be sure you mail them to a person at the IRS, too, and not just the agency.
        2. There may be a way to get another real name to assess the tax on. You could put a purchase order into a stock broker or liability because corporate liabilities are duties of Coroner. If they had an official listing and fail to answer, then the County Attorney is the person to answer the letter. Their being vague about disclosing who or where the Coroner is [located] is pretty good evidence they are hiding something.
        3. If you need something [an amount] for value of the Attorney you might just give him a short note telling him you are re-directing the Coroners letter to him as he is the obvious supervisor. (his portfolio is draped in a Black Flag)
        4. With what I have already sent to you, and with this, you should be able to move ahead with this. Other contributors in the meantime might give some positive direction!
        5. I have a fellow I need to answer some questions for. His name is Al Riley, 3L Therapy Distributors, 2310 w 41st Street, Suite 101, Sioux Falls, SD 57105. He might shed some light on these matters, too. He has a number of 1040-V successes with IRS. He needs some help with some that I think will be pretty easy to solve.
        6. 10-19-06 Dear charge they wish to bring on me, but they have, also, indicated that charge might hold for time served concurrent with the others. Then, the 25th would still be the day of release. These are charges that only pertain to losing privileges in this administration. So, there isn’t too much they can do. One important thing about this is, the fact of a charge to the H Block is a charge that I think connects to the Bid Bonds, Performance Bonds, Miller Act Bonds, and US Bonds. The reason no connection might not be made, otherwise, is when Probable Cause is assumed there is no factual connection until one is charged, here, in H Block, for instance. So I, probably, will have a hearing, tomorrow, and I will have them put my 1040 into evidence of the case. That should connect all the revenue, in fact, that, otherwise, eludes us because the Admiralty business hampers my writing some, so bear with me until this is finished and then a few days to get re-adjusted into the dorm life, again. But, this experience might hold some answers for where and how to make connection of the charges that, otherwise, escape us. 22
        7. 10-23-06 Dear business by that particular artificial name. If you strike out there, then use the Secretary of State for the Recipient and, maybe, the company name as Payer. You could use your own name as Payer, too. Another alternative is ask the IRS for a contact person and TIN#. Send the 1040-V to that person if the company/agency won’t provide a name. But, don’t sent it to IRS if you don’t have a real person name.
        8. Then, you mention GP was told his remedy is in the District Admiralty! So, let’s discuss this now. When you receive a account as a prize. Therefore, it takes a Reprisal to take the prize from them and, of course, with the 1099-OID filed, the 1040-V is the move to “take delivery” of the prize and make Pay to the United States Treasury. Now, it’s a prize held by the Treasury. Now, the District Admiralty could, also, be ruling from the tax attorney or, maybe, the bankruptcy trustee for the pirates.
        9. One wants to consider that Copy A and Copy C of the 1099-OID do not have a Black Box around the Federal Withholding box. Only Copy B does, and that is the copy that goes to the Recipient. So, that is the prize you are looking for to Pay to the United States Treasury taking the prize by a Letter of Marque and reprisal (re-prize). Now, it is up to the District Admiralty to Pay the Prize out to the owner. It is the 1040/1040-V/1099-OID/1096 that is the Court of Record by which the prize is identified. It is, also, the Letter of Marque and Reprisal being the Record of the taking of the prize! Maybe that explanation will shorten the methods everyone is looking to recapture their plundered property.
        10. 7-1-06 Dear E, I got your letter yesterday and have read all your material and letter, so I will try to get your letter answered with as much meaningful information as I can.
        11. I am much better with the itching staph infection, but there are still some lingering effects that are a little uncomfortable but for the most part are nearly gone. I think I have it licked! I’ll have some things to say about that when I am free of this detention.
        12. You addressing the 1099 OID as you did seems to be agreement (venue) or revenue! (Tax recovery!)
        13. When you speak of a mortgage? In my understanding, the agreement. A trustor, trustee, and beneficiary. How are the terms lender and issuer to be viewed? It is my understanding that it is the trustor who names the trustee and beneficiary to the trustee and beneficiary from then on. If a lender has come on the scene with a deal between him and the trustee, for monetary value, where did the original issue come from and how did you and your property become obligated to the lender? You had to have ownership of the property before a mortgage could be put on the property, and, I will bet the mortgage will refer to the surrender of contract itself that has the surrender value –not the house
        . The house is only listed close by so that inexperienced eyes assume the contract itself. Simply put the question to them, that when you obtained the mortgage (your trustee did) you had to own the house to put a mortgage on it, did you not? Then how did the lender acquire ownership of the house when the contract itself is the asset that you have returned to him for that value! (Acceptance and return for value!) That being the fact of the matter probably won’t stop their game but you might put it to them and see. At least this is on alternative you have.
      10. But as I read further down in your letter, it looks like the Trustee and lender might be one and the same person and you might ask them for the account the original issue funds came from to pay for any position contrary to yours in the house, and remind them that those funds are taxable income and you want to see the Individual and/or Corporate Income Tax Return to show who can vouch for any claim on your house. Without those items and their refusal to produce them it is safe to conclude they don’t exist, except if they insist you owe them anything, then they are withholding from you which is taxable income reportable on 1099 OID and assessed on 1040 as your personal income that is pre-paid in the issue returned to the source on 1099 OID for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct # (your SS#). 23
      11. The amount they say is still owed should go on the 1099 OID as original issue and is Federal Withholding, but you also want to list the checks they gave you as original issue, but not Federal withholding because you are the recipient of those funds. But the original issue of those funds are still reported as your personal income, but are not in Federal withholding.
      12. `Then you mention the funds you have paid in over the years. I would say to put those on another 1099 OID apart from what is above but sum up those years on one form 1040 and put an itemized list to describe them with your 1040 when you enter the 1099’s on lie 64. The itemized list can sum up the particular years into this last year to bring them current.
      13. Since I am not quite clear on the relationship of lender and trustee, let me say; that, the Fore closure is a prior event that the escrow agent (whoever he was) at the time of original issue, is delinquent in paying out the escrow, to close the escrow, at the 1st instance. If there happens to be a Foreclosure Order (a mortgage, then inform the trustee the prior event of Fore closure is delinquent and a priority to hold the Lender or escrow agent in contempt of that prior Fore closure Order. You might give them a letter to that effect to let them know you intend to bring them into Federal Tax mortgage or are the funds still in the possession and withheld by the trustee or lender, the same being a priority and breach of mortgage was and is pre-paid by virtue of the mortgage in the 1st place, but the escrow agent failed to pay out the escrow in foreclosure. Fore means the prior/priority event. If the trustee is not the same as the lender, then identify him as a middleman and recipient who has those funds withheld in his possession that is a Federal Withholding by virtue of the 1099 OID being a Federal Tax Form etc., and you will have assessed the same (self assessment) as your personal income in your 1040 tax return. The 1040 is to return the tax to you. The 1099 OID carries the issue back to the source so a tax refund can issue.
      14. If you decide to list the bills they gave you over the years on 1099 OID and 1040, the amount you paid them should also be listed, as your personal income, as both debit and account as net worth. They are added together for that. Then it becomes One World “money” Order. This is probably expressed by Brokers in their use of what they call “Straddles”. They are using both Certificate of Security for sale. Then their use of a “Tranche” seems to be the same equivalent but is vertical integration rather than horizontal (left and admiralty term, but for one to view the account thereof, the eyewitness thereof is looking at ground –0- (zero). I don’t think the Admiralty can be anything different as there is no beneficiary to the beneficiary inherits only after death of someone leaving a Will. And a Will only has power after death of the testator
    . Are we not in probate of the Will of Jesus Christ who is dead and has risen and did he not give his promise to pay the debts of those who confess those debts? Are you named as beneficiary on the promise to pay should accelerate the Mortgage payments all due NOW! Because it is a risen lord that redeems the judgment. It is Jesus Christ who goes down into the Pit – the mill levy assessment 1000 years etc. It is Christ Jesus who rises up from the pit after the 1000 years when traveling at the speed of light (children of light) does this not happen in the twinkling of an eye? (2nd coming).
  • Notice that the Name is last name first on the return to earth. Did he not fall on the earth a felon and he lives in the heart and soul of he/she who says he lives in them? Anyway this should help you to comment the date and get your tax returns current. It is the IRS that is the regulator of internal revenue; – the new venue or revenue in tax recovery. The public revenue is tax delinquent and one must have a license to have it in possession, but when you identify that taxable income assessed on 1040 as yours, then the IRS must go after the thief who withheld from you, or the one who executed a 24
  • contract and killed the straw man and needs a whole new accrued amount restored via a tax refund. Were there not both a murderer and a thief crucified with Christ on the cross. Is that not the double cross in the

  • Did not the water (H2O) and blood (1099) drain out of the body of Christ from the cross and go to the ground –0- (zero), but did the O therefrom not rise to heaven? (zero and O are not the same – but to look at them they look the same).
  • Notice the water and blood went to the ground and not to the earth or dust. Did not the O rise up from the ground (dust from dust and ashes from ashes) leaving the dust and ashes behind and rising with the smoke and separating therefrom as they rise. The ashes soon fall to earth in conization(?), purified by their electronic character drawn into the electronic fields that are white unto harvest. Is this a white light of a radio band or account as your personal income when you list all on the 1099 OID and assess the same on the 1040. It is all your account. Who was the one who first gave you an assessment of the withholding at Social Security? Get the name of whoever is closest to that source. Whoever is in charge of the office where you first applied for SS, or the Commissioner of SS etc. They should be named as an individual as the recipient. I m not sure how a corporate name would work there, but being the IRS as an organization doesn’t answer correspondence then you need a name of a person who will need to confess the claim on a tax return to continue a contrary claim, to the 1099 OID. They then commit perjury when that happens. (Its their contract for aids).
  • It is the Tax court of record Article III. That is where the 1040 assesses the taxable income that is in product one uses a certificate of agreement as they deny “it” is their admission of what is withheld. Whatever “it” is!
  • When you list the money years accumulations of the funds paid into them, I think I would put each one on a separate 1099 OID as that probably identifies different entities and those then are put together and sent under a single 1096. Then it is the sum total of those that go on line 21 and thence to line 64 of the 1040. It is on the 1040 you might want to list particulars to help identify the issues of the 1099 OID’s. I see no need for filing more than one 1040. Everything can be summed up in a single 1040 I think. That brings all the delinquent years current. Once you have identified your personal income in all the issues the banks have claimed on interest in, then all the products they have used your court of record. The Record being the 1040.
  • So, it seems the Admiralty voice – so many like to take is limited to the O or the ground –0- zero I mentioned. But there is more to this but probably not applicable to what you address here. The optical view of a witness is closely related to electrical magnetic energy related to magnification in the optical – as this has to do with fore and aft. But the optic also has an upside-down view, but does not do this side by side as that goes horizontal. So, as you can see it would be a distraction to get into that.
  • PS – The Ohio Gov signed a security both what you have been paid and what they withhold. What goes on line 21 is the entire amount owed to you on Original Issue, but what you were paid is shown to be the recipient so that amount is not in Federal withholding, but it is still your personal income. What you didn’t get paid is what is in Federal Withholding. You do the same thing with the checks they have given you pertaining to your mortgage the same way.

    You need to list all products that your income proves you to be the owner that way. Thus the 1040 is the certificate of property. Without it you can’t prove you own it.

    So, again I say: All your social security paid to you and, what was withheld is listed as Original Issue. But the amount not paid is withheld and goes into the Federal Withholding box on the 1099 OID form.

    1. Dear E: 07/31/06 Let me start to answer your letter by first saying you seem to be referring to accrual accounting relating to product inventory etc., after we have ordered product or received product maybe not ordered. Anyway, you seem to refer to charge from one cell to another in ones body. (the body is chemistry). So, the mortgage, etc., have assumed (your identity ss#) and used that as the investment capital (strawman) to create the product you are billed for. But this part being a part of an accrual does not connect the product from a pool of mortgages that your product driving from the Capital Invested was/is charged by the raw material, IN A BLOCKED GRANT, put into the crucible that produced the product, the same being prepaid! So, the funds from the product. But now, you get billed to settle the Foreclosure Order, the same being a pre-paid event by the capitalization of your product you are billed for. That Fore closure being a prior event – thus priority, that commands the first fruits of the investment until settlement occurs. Now, you should know what charges the account has not been charged. The true mortgage foreclosures are alleged the accused is charged with the counts of indictment, but that accusation is a lie because, the devils advocates (the lawyers) have made the alleged charge withholding and they lie – thus a withholding HOLD goes on the accused because of the absence of a “charge”! The electronic circuits (escrows) are held open because the electro magnetic lock on the city (municipal gate) is open and it takes a charge of magnetic energy to pull the gate/switch of the circuit closed to enable the charge to return to its source. (To the Treasury Direct to your SS#.)
    1. Now we get to the charge. So, we report the obligation to write his check to pay the seller in discharge of his obligation thereon.
    2. So, now you can see the tax is the charge that closes the circuit of the administrative hold to enable charged settlement to pass into the Treasure Direct via your SS#. The administrative hold (withholding) is maintained when there is no charge to close the circuit/switch to allow the charge (the tax) to pass into the treasury. It is the open circuit or open escrow that enables the administration to maintain the administrative hold on prisoners. (The voluntary withholding of taxable income) This is what is reportable on 1099-OID and 1040.
    3. So, when we file Federal Tax Form 1099-OID and return the issue to the source via Federal Withholding and then issue IRS our Money Order with the 1040-voucher, the Money Order charges the escrow agent, or rather instructs the IRS to charge the escrow agent to pay or discharge his obligation to issue his check to the seller (lender) etc. So, it app-ears that the act of the escrow agent issuing his check both charges the escrow in discharge of his charge resulting in –0- balance in the bank account itself. (When the check comes back to the account to be cancelled!)
    4. Any of those conditions you mention as some interest others have in the account are all offers withheld as taxable income, so there is nothing that qualifies to show any other interest amount against the Original Issue Discount – That opposing amount is –0-, so all the principal expressed in the charge is equal to the charge and the charge. They are drawn together by magnetic energy as found in electrons binding other electrons of intersecting orbits etc. Is this the omnipotent the bible refers to? The omni being the energy in the computer circuits and the basis for the Omnibus Crime agreement, when in fact we do/did not agree. But it is the 1040 (the holy ground) that charges the set-off on a Foreclosure. Is the option taken at the date the mortgage was given? (But it is still a delinquent tax.) Anyway, these ideas are only our own speculation now. But might apply to more complex events as our affairs move on.
    5. You mention our account is assumed and also assumed to be charged when in fact it is not. Are you thinking your signature on the mortgage is the promise to pay in the mortgage is the promise of the Lender to “pay” or fund the mortgage. He has not done this, as the accrued amount of the mortgage has been separated and sold into the securities market. Then an Order (Money Order) is issued to Fore close. It is that Fore closure order the Lender is in contempt of, because; he has breached the promise to pay, and duped you into thinking you had signed that promise to pay, when you only signed the guarantee that he would pay. Remember, the state cannot be hooked up to evidence in fact that they can charge anything. If the state were to be called to testify, there is no one by that name who has a social security number who can appear or answer except to remain silent. If you were to face your accuser (Lender) and ask him if what he has told the charge. So, the 1099 family of Federal Tax Forms comes into use to report casino proceeds, and it is that report that shows taxable income but does not identify whose it is until you file a 1040 and assess that income as your liability. Thus a follow-up of 1040-V or 1040-ES seems to assess the tax on the particular 1099 issue as the regular 1040 tax return at the end of the calendar year does too.
    1. So, getting back to the 1st issue of product. When that was finished Israel had to cross the red sea on mortgage 40 years). That wilderness is the spread between Wholesale and Retail. The product is Wholesale – accrual balance = O.
    2. So, here we see that the product. The charged tax revenue (a small claim) is in the Retail (the tail end of the deal, becomes the head as the Wholesale is pre-paid) and the retail is tax recovery (a small claim) charged to make bricks without straw. (The bricks meaning atoms fit together by magnetic charged tax) – your body and property growing in a great multitude. The spiritual unseen real person – the body in the shadow – the flesh; and the blood, the charge that gives life to the flesh. The two are one flesh. Did not the Roman Soldier pierce the body of Jesus on the cross and the water and blood went to the ground and left the flesh body Israel leaving Egypt (a finished industrial product) that was laid in a tomb (inventory in a warehouse) (a prisoner) until the body is claimed to be part of a living owners estate.

    Were not the 3 wise men coming to the product).

    1. So, after product expressed in a mortgage – pre-pay! Are not the Retail agreements all small claims (widow’s mite) and charges that are not account. The next three 000s are Capital Hill that derives from the first 3 (000s) to equal 1,000,000. accruing to = 1,000,000.000,000,1 the mirror image = 0. (Facing one another – or one facing his accuser?) When you ask for the amount of charges do not the accusers answer with silence?
    2. So, to be sure you are not duped by a mortgage (A LARGE AND CAPITAL AMOUNT), you take that as a new offering (snot of acceptance and return for settlement. So, each proceeds from the gambling casino. The state is the regulator of casinos, and the entire state is run as a casino now-a-days. So, when the conditions of us obtaining proceeds or tokens for proceeds, or other property, that requires reporting the value thereof as personal income, the 1099 OID is for that purpose. And when a interest we have on the MBSs. But that is ours including principal and interest, not as a deduction, but as a reportable liability. That should go on line 21 and 64 of the 1040. You have a choice to take a deduction or report the liability. If you work out the worksheets in the 1040 Instruction Booklet you will see the assumption is strong to use the deduction but it is not a requirement, and the result is you will have the liability shown as your income and ultimately shows up as a tax refund. That’s how the upside down world is set upright again.
    3. When you receive a product and there is no check will it, the sender is voluntarily withholding taxable income admitted in the promise to pay. That is a reportable gambling casino proceed 1099-OID reportable event. You are using the word revenue they are booking, but it is not a small claim as a matter of fact and is being treated as taxable income but is not yet taxed by someone reporting 1040 to assess it as personal income thus it is not revenue. The corporations and investigators will call it tax or taxable revenue but it is not revenue until it has a 1040 assessment and social security number to identify whom it belongs to. Otherwise it is deferred business issued a acceptance and return for settlement. It is the dishonour that takes the matter into the international world of revenue. The new venue called revenue. Now you are eligible for tax recovery, a small claim. That’s 1099 OID and 1040 time.
    4. E 8/2/06 JR and another have finished a request to the federal Reserve Account and instructions to access and operate the account. Maybe a personal officer at your charge for the withholding. So, he is using the name of the Secretary of State, to charge, with the money order to IRS. That should soon put a stop to the agency sending nameless billings. The secretary, I am sure, certainly will not want to be bothered by an agency’s withholding taxable income that will need to be accounted for on his/her personal 1040 tax return.

    Dear E:08/10/06

    1. You mentioned my 1099 OID filings where I had myself as recipient. That was some of the first ones, and I think now I wouldn’t do that, because; at the time I was thinking I had received the social security benefits, but that doesn’t mean I am a recipient of the funds. I received the product, which was pre-paid, but the funds are something different than the product. One can still be billed for product after you have received product, so that tells you the product and the funds used to purchase product are different transactions. So, as a result, I have decided to still list the SS benefits as original issue, but not Federal Withholding. That way the income in the product is still listed as mine (reported on 1040). But listing that way I don’t take it for a tax refund, because; I already have gotten paid.
    2. I am almost of the mind now to think I will be the payer on all the 1096/1099 OID filings, and using my SS# from which the funds issue that in itself says the funds came from the strawman. But when I sign the 1096, I will just sign without reservation as representative in upper and lower case. The surety I think.
    3. I think the solution is more simple than we tend to think, and maybe that will emerge as we pursue the 30 pieces of silver in the cemetery lots reserved in the name of the resident on the rolls of the Municipality. That oath showing up as 28 $30,000. charge the escrow agent to pay the delivery of the accrual to us. The product seems to travel independent of the product seems to be pre-paid product from our delivery expenses or simply profits/prophets to the creditor or whatever one wants to call them. They are making a contract product being pre-paid, the product and entered the wilderness – the spread between wholesale and retail – thus the retail settlement was not closed, but the wholesale pre-paid!
    4. Dear Rockney, June 08, 2006 I got your letter today and I will try to connect the dots you asked about. But you might write to franchise employees are trained to use as a trap to stop your efforts to close escrow on the items(s). Furthermore, my name has been associated with those items you mention that you say RL learned from me. But that is not so, because, RL assumed certain things come from me via others that got to circulating, whereas many assumed I taught these things when I did not. There were sting operators peddling information in my name for a number of years, relying on people like RL who were freely assuming their own conclusions were mine when they were not!
    5. The reason everything is pre-paid is because; the whole country is regulated under a mortgage is foreclosed when they give you a mortgage is pre-paid by virtue of your name and product they then product they product as a matter of fact. But in their assuming the use of your account # of your name (they take prisoners), but until someone gets delinquent on payments no one is aware of them using your account already pledged for another certificate of deposit. But in a mortgage foreclosure the word foreclosure tells much of the story. The word fore means prior and the word prior means priority in this sense. The second part of that word is closure and that means just what it says; closure (closing escrow) where you have a mortgage) for return to the source for settlement and closing in exchange …Treasury Direct # (your SS#). The account is pre-paid by virtue of the product they billed for. Then it is the account) that is reportable on Federal Tax for 1099 OID on that particular issue for return to the source for settlement and closing in exchange Treasury Direct # (your SS#). Then subsequently file the 1040 return to assess the amount tax back to the source with the 1099 OID as your personal income.
    6. Remember, it is the
    7. The Withholding is the Tax delinquent national currency, (a tax deferral) that must be held in reserve by the business organization that issued the pre-paid account is pre-paid. Those funds Withheld are taxable income belonging to the name and SS# from which the set-off by deferral – leaving the bankruptcy et. al, methods to make one WHOLE. But that concept too is flawed by foreclosure, because; whole numbers are not a small claim, because, one must go from whole numbers to negative numbers or from venue to revenue and to the small claim for tax recovery. You cannot use whole numbers to make a small claim as the matter is tax recovery. (in accrual)
    8. The derivative used to assume the use of your account going into the account of the current user. It is otherwise known as the “ghost account”. This is the “identity property owners. Some own rental contracts. These are funded by the purchase of mutual funds through the sponsor, who is the county attorney in the county where the municipality is located. It is your BLOCKED charge is attached to your SS# HELD as collateral for the product thereof. These funds are not traceable until a interest etc., to follow a line of reasoning will take you into a appearance interest are summed up in the sight of an eye witness taking federal tax returns and time is almost meaningless because; eye sight depends on light to be seen, and the account travels at the speed of light, thus 25 years are served thereby in an instant traveling at the speed of light on radio beams in electronic transfer. (Does not the redeemer promise to disregard the debts when confessed and take the 1st born into the fold again?). The same being pre-paid?
    9. Your speaking of the acceptance is really accepting the promise. The promise being a future event. So, with wholesale representing a finished product the next stop is to market the product at retail (tail end of the process) thus, the product given to the consumer and charging him with consumption. The tail end becomes the head. But the interesting thing is that the foreclosure is a PRIOR event in which a tax return is needed in evidence as the voucher to prove ownership / product your are billed for. So the 1040 return is the Certificate of property as a matter of fact in that administrative court of record. (the 1040)
    10. The other matters of financing you mention in your letter are all grounded in the tax delinquent venue. They all are open escrows and abandoned property. The funds you refer to are delinquent product you are seeking possession of?

    30 That’s what actually proves the fact of ownership / charge is a

  • Do they file the 1099-A because the principal does not accept the presentment via UCC 3-410 as described in J.K.’s treatise and goes into dishonor and contempt? On criminal matters.
  • Answer:. The 1099 filing is not 1099-A, but 1099 OID

    1. Would the IRS tax forms work with the IRS if they send a
    2. Both the 1099 and 1040 seems to based on common sense, is there anything special in the way it needs to be filled out?

    Answer: Check the correction box at the top to disconnect any prior assumptions; and put your SS# in the bottom box marked “account number” to prevent this account from interception and/or diversion into hands of the confederate as a tax deferral. If that happened it would thereby be left as

  • If a contract is signed on a house or car, does the same principals apply? I mean they are not sending you a property?
  • Answer: They are giving you the account is pre-paid etc.

    1. Is it necessary to exhaust your administrative remedies any longer when all you need to do is bring settlement and closure with this technology?

    Answer: The acceptance of the delivery of product is exhausting your administrative / state remedy by their dishonor. Next is: the Federal Tax Forms 1099 OID for settlement

    1. In the two years of reading your transcripts from B.B. and now this tax technology, I don’t every recall you citing one
    2. Is doing a notary protest on a dishonored payment still needed enlight of your tax tech?

    Answer: Notary Protest is a tax Protest and invites charges from the IRS if you don’t get them from a State organization!

    1. You should have enough basic information herein to figure out all your particular issues and options with those.
    2. When you file a 1040 there is nothing I know of that says we must declare tax deductions to reduce taxable income! So I don’t bother to list them. But then too, with accrual accounting, the deductions are still added to increase the income figures; but should show this particular accounting on an attachment to the 1040.
    3. I would suggest you not use the closed account checks as those too are subject to what your tax returns show in fact. Read the Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac article to see they don’t know what they are doing with their own accounting. They even believe they don’t take prisoners, but we know they do. They don’t know how to account the
    4. Dear Rockney, June 28, 2006 CARD

    This is to acknowledge your last letter. It helps me to know if you are comprehending what I wrote. I don’t have any new news, except to say; that since I have brought my tax returns current, Wells Fargo deposit they took from me in 1996 and it looks like I am going to get a settlement as they now recognize my claim in tax recovery. But for now, I think you will have plenty of information to examine that

  • Dear Rockney, July 07, 06 CARD 31
  • I got your letter and money order without any hang-ups. Thank you. No particular reason to write except to acknowledge your correspondence coming through with no difficulty. No need for me to comment any further for the need to be current on filing income tax returns until you get through my comments and have any particular questions. I have just filed a couple three 1099’s and amended my 1040 via 1040X. These were some state organization trying to shake themselves off of the 1st tax report by making me a new account. So the tax obligation on withholding continues to grow when they keep giving me Bills to add to the withholding. I think after this last tax returns filed they are starting to get the message. We will soon see. Until then I will look forward to your comments when you have had a chance to examine the stuff I gave you in my last letter. Thank you for being so prompt with the copies enclosed. – Good Hunting….Roger

    1. Dear Rockney, 07/21/06 CARD

    I got your 2nd package of forms…but after what we have worked on the last couple days, it looks like we will be only using 2006 dated forms. The older ones you sent are usable for working copies. Winston introduced the use of 1040-ES, but I think we will be using 1040-V instead and that will enable one to use that along with 2006 1099-OID and let them accumulate until year-end when they go on the regular 1040. That will enable us to file the 1099-OID on each

  • Dear Rockney 07-26-06
  • Today we are working out acceptances of an auto offering and a Real Estate charge the escrow agent. The 1099-OID is mailed on the day the acceptance therewith, announcing the 1040-V is sent with the money order to IRS ordering them to Pay……?????? Pay to the US Treasury and charge the same to the escrow agent (his name) etc., etc. That way the money order reaches the IRS at Kansas City, MO the same time or later than the 1099-OID going to Cincinnati. We need to do this because the escrow agent needs to be charged by the IRS to pay out the escrow. They don’t have anything to pay with until the IRS charges them to pay. They will probably get a check from the Treasury itself to charge the escrow.

    1. So, the contract is the Realtor’s letter asking for a bid after he has received an acceptance of the advertised offering, that goes on to say: This is the contract to bind the parties (meaning this letter). So, on an acceptance of that is signed in the upper left corner of the letter and on the bottom, somewhere where there is room to write: Money Order (IRS form 1040) # 0001, date ??, Pay……00000 these small dollars. Pay to the United States Treasury and charge the same to John Doe escrow agent at his address.

    Memo: Acct # (your SS#) By: ___yours truly___

    M.O. # IRS Route SS#

    0001 062736011 123456789

    So, you see the information that goes on the Realtors contract because all signatures are on there and the original of that is mailed to IRS with the 1040-V as the Money Order itself worked like you see above.

    The money orders I did myself I will give example below.

    _______________________________________________________________________________________

    Internal Revenue Service

    Kansas City, MO 64999-0102

    Please find my money order herewith 1040-V

    Roger Doe Money Order # 0001

    P.O. Box 59 Void Where Prohibited by Law

    Somewhere, OH 00000

    07/26/06

    1,000,000.00

     

    Yusef El

    Own and Creator of Private Side Solutions and SPC University

    Leave a Reply